The Bos\’un Locker

During times of war and during times of peace, we must prepare for tomorrow with the realities of today.

All Hail, President Obama

Posted by thebosun on March 9, 2009

It has been increasingly quiet for American service personnel in Iraq in the past few weeks.   Looks like President Oby won the war, in less than 45 days. Now he can concentrate on pulling the troops out of Afghanistan, pulling the plug on missile shield in eastern Europe, throw eastern European friends under the socialist bus, side with the Russians, throw Israel under the bus, side with the Arabs, etc etc.

all in a days work for President Oby.

But, Iraq, President Oby won the war in less than 45 days. He straightened out Bush’s Quagmire…..

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries | 3 Comments »

Will Obama betray Lebanon and Israel in favor of Syria?

Posted by thebosun on March 8, 2009

One of my friends, Jibaro, posted a poll on Hannity forum.   Jibaro contends that there is a possibility that President Obama’s administration may betray Lebanon and Israel in favor of terrorism Syria.   Obama’s senior negotiators meeting with Syrians report significant results.

A senior US envoy involved in the first high-level contact between the US and Syria since 2005 has said the talks were "very constructive".  Jeffrey Feltman, acting assistant US secretary of state for the Near East, met officials including Foreign Minister Walid Muallem in Damascus.  Source: New US-Syria talks ‘constructive’

I would like to point out that the Obamanation of United States foreign policy was predictable from day one with Obama’s coin toss for change and the liberals jumping to catch Obama’s loose change toose. 

Many on the left side of American politics totally support the Palestinian cause without knowing the facts.   Many have given money indirectly to Hamas organizations through third party charities.   Many knowingly give directly to Hamas.  Heck, many on the left side of American politics look at Hezbollah as legitimate.  We all can agree that many on the left side of American politics don’t particularly like Christians, and many, including some liberal Jews are anti-Zion and anti-Israel.

Many fail to see that G_d made a covenant with the Hebrew people.

Radical Muhammadans have been trying to disprove the covenant and say that the Qur’an and Old Testament are corrupted from about that time that Muhammad was rejected by the people of the book,Ahl al-Kitāb  ( أهل الكتاب ‎).  Radical Muhammadans are also intent on tearing apart the true faith of Abraham (insert the illegitimate son, Ishmael, as heir apparent, and discounting Isaac.)

In the face of the inexplicable (apology and appeasement of Obamunism) we must keep faith and try to stay true to the course charted by the founding fathers of America. It is difficult given the  conduct of some who claim to be republicans and/or conservative.

This current trend of Obamunism apology and appeasement of terrorists is a fine example of how those who deserted conservatism in the mid term 2006 elections (put Pelosi and Reid in charge of the legislative branch) did more damage to our country than they would like to believe.

During the 2008 Election we had community activism, ACORN and other activist organizations, and a whole bunch of liberals suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome vote in the 2008 elections to enthrone Obamanation.

When it is all said and done, I wonder if those who stayed home during the 2006 mid term elections are happy.  I wonder if those who voted for activism loose change are happy with themselves and their votes, now.

May G_d bless and protect the free world from apology and appeasement of terrorists and the fascism they are trying to spread…

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries | Leave a Comment »

Illegals

Posted by thebosun on March 3, 2009

From my friends at Numbers USA

ANOTHER CHANCE TO PUSH E-VERIFY — Phone to Get Long-Term Extension in Spending Bill

DEAR FRIENDS,

Your anti-illegal-immigration allies in the U.S. House have asked us to get your help Tuesday and Wednesday in obtaining signatures on a crucial letter (see text below).

They need you to support their last-ditch effort to put a long-term extension of the E-Verify program in the giant spending bill before Congress this week.

When we are asked directly by Members of Congress for help, we have to be willing to back them up. They know that the only way to succeed is if they have your help in phoning their colleagues and asking them to sign a crucial letter to House Speaker Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Minority Leader Boehner (R-Ohio).

The key point sentence of the letter is this:

“Please do everything within your power to protect legal workers by ensuring that the E-Verify program is reauthorized long-term in the Omnibus Appropriations Act.”

Pelosi and Boehner have the power to make that happen when the bill comes to the House/Senate negotiating committee if they would just resolve to do it.

Your assignment — if you choose to accept it — is to phone your own U.S. Representative and ask him/her to sign the letter.

Step 1: Just phone your Rep at 202-224-3121.
Step 2: Tell the staffers that their boss has already received a letter about E-Verify from Rep. Bilbray’s office.
Step 3: Read the key sentence that I quoted above.
Step 4: Ask that your Rep contact Congressman Bilbray’s office at 225-0508 and pledge to sign the letter — or at least to get another copy of it to read. (YOU should NOT call Mr. Bilbray’s office because that will tie up his phone.)
Step 5: Note that Mr. Bilbray has to receive the pledge by the close of business Wednesday.
Step 6: Emphasize that the American people are growing tired of the delaying tactics of Congress over the last six months. It is time to stop treating E-Verify as a political football and to give it the long-term authorization that states and businesses need to be able to rely on the program.
Thanks for taking quick action on this.

If your own Representative is Pelosi or Boehner, they obviously won’t be signing the letter. Just phone them and tell them that you agree with the letter that is being sent to them from other Members.

If your Rep is Bilbray or Shuler (original signers), give their staffs a break and call a neighboring Member of Congress.

Here is the letter you are asking your Congress(wo)man to sign:

Dear Madam Speaker and Republican Leader Boehner:

As Members of the House of Representatives, we appeal to you on behalf of American workers. Nationwide, 7.6 percent of the labor force–11.6 million workers–is unemployed, and millions more are involuntarily working part-time or have given up hope of finding a job. Estimates of the number of jobs that might be created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the Recovery Act) vary widely. While no one can predict exactly how many jobs will be created, we believe that the American people deserve to know that their tax dollars are being used to create jobs for legal workers.

While the House version of the Recovery Act included two E-Verify-related measures to ensure American jobs would be protected, the Senate failed to include similar language. Because of the Senate’s oversight, we, the undersigned Members of the House of Representatives, urge you to protect taxpayers and legal workers by including these critical jobs protection provisions in any future economic recovery legislation. The House version of the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009, H.R. 1105, included a short-term extension of the E-Verify program through the end of the fiscal year (September 30, 2009). While a short-term extension is a step in the right direction, it is difficult for business to plan and effectively utilize the program without its secure future.

According to recent analysis, as many as 300,000 illegal aliens could receive jobs funded by the recovery program because these provisions were not included in the final version of the Recovery Act. If these provisions do not become law, not only will the important E-Verify program be in danger of expiring on March 6, 2009, but it may mean that hundreds of thousands of potential jobs for American workers will be compromised.

The E-Verify program enjoys a success rate of 99.6%, meaning that 99.6% of those legal workers checked by the program are verified through E-Verify without receiving a tentative non-confirmation (TNC) or having to take any type of corrective action. Testifying in June, Rep. Heath Shuler said, “E-Verify is handling at least one in eight new hires already. Based on recent load testing, the system has the capacity to handle 240 million queries a year – that’s four times the number of people in the United States who are usually hired in a given year.” The E-Verify program is reliable, easy to use and, most importantly, expedient.

Employers who break the law by hiring illegal immigrants create unfair competition in the labor market and depress wages for all workers. The Center for Immigration Studies has found that the current level of immigration has reduced the wages of the average native-born worker in a low-skilled occupation by 12% a year, or almost $2,000. Alexander Aleinikoff, a former Clinton Administration INS official, Dean of Georgetown Law School and co-chair of the Immigration Policy Review Team for the Presidential Transition of Barack Obama, calls it a “myth” that “there is little or no competition between undocumented workers and American workers . . . .”

According to estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center, roughly 7.7 million illegal immigrants are employed in the United States in 2008. These are all jobs that currently unemployed United States workers–both citizens and legal immigrants–could and should have a chance to fill. If the E-Verify program is not reauthorized, this Congress and our President will spend more than $1 trillion of taxpayer money to possibly provide jobs for illegal workers. Please do everything within your power to protect legal workers by ensuring that the E-Verify program is reauthorized long-term in the Omnibus Appropriations Act.

# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries | 2 Comments »

Welfare Entitlements Reparations Act of 2009

Posted by thebosun on March 1, 2009

Welfare Entitlements Reparations Act of 2009


Just a month a few days of loose change in the White House (gotta change that name to pink house, yellow house, red house, or ****house) President Barry Milhous Obamy signed the Welfare Entitlements Reparations Act of 2009, essentially making the average American taxpayer be libel to the tune of $25,000 tax bill and rising. (Financially challenged will collect $500 and a debt free house courtesy of the Acorn Mortgage Management Corporation).

Barry Milhous Obamy, the new Robin Hood of the Washington Forest, figures that by the time he is done robbing the rich to pay the poor, America will be fleeced dry and he can then sell all Federal Land to the China, Russia, and Venezuela. And, Russia can claim the oil on the Alaska North Slopes, that way his hands will be clean for the environmentalists.

From what I understand Hot Dog Frank, Stretch Pelosi, Swift-boat (rice in his but) Kerry, and Sheets Reid will overturn the 22nd Amendment and install the messiah for life.

Pelosi was overheard telling Barbie Boxer that she has never had a better time ****ing the stupid voters and that the swamp mice are multiplying and taking up residence in the Bart tunnel. That should stop the Bart trains and save the economy of the flower city.

Mission accomplished **** you John Wayne and put your apple pie someplace else.

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries | 1 Comment »

NRO: Preserving ‘Harmony’ for Islamic Radicals

Posted by thebosun on February 15, 2009

Courtesy of National Review Online

Preserving ‘Harmony’ for Islamic Radicals
Geert Wilders is barred from entering the United Kingdom.
By Andrew C. McCarthy

It has come to this: If you are an Islamic radical, trained to carry out terrorist atrocities in al-Qaeda’s jihad against the United Kingdom, the British will welcome you with open arms. Not content with that, Great Britain will lobby insistently for your release from custody so that you may freely roam British streets—and the halls of Westminster.

If, by contrast, you are a duly elected representative in the democratic government of a country to which England is bound in the European Union, and you speak about the undeniable—though mulishly denied—nexus between Islamic doctrine and jihadist terror, Great Britain will slam her door in your face.

That is the lesson in the appalling saga of Geert Wilders, a member of the Dutch parliament and Exhibit Umpty-Umpth illustrating the depths of capitulation to which the West has sunk in its half-hearted bid for cultural survival.

On Tuesday, British Home Secretary Jacqui Smith took time out of her busy schedule of protecting from extradition Britain’s expanding roster of resident terrorists to warn Wilders that he was not welcome in the country—notwithstanding that the vision of Europe as a “union” is supposed to mean that Europeans may travel freely within it. Quite apart from the fact that Wilders is a government official of the Netherlands, he was not visiting the U.K. on a lark. He was the invited guest of Malcolm Pearson, a member of the House of Lords. Lord Pearson and Baroness Caroline Cox (a human-rights activist who has worked tirelessly on behalf of enslaved and oppressed Christians and Muslims in Sudan) had asked Wilders to screen his short, controversial film, Fitna.
Wilders is a lightning rod. In the great tradition of the Enlightenment, and to the consternation of post-sovereign Europe, he faithfully reports what his senses perceive. When he studies the Koran, he finds exhortations to violence. When he reads Allah’s command in Sura 9:5 that “when the sacred months have passed,” Muslims must “slay the idolaters wherever ye find them,” he entertains the outlandish idea that this means what it plainly says, and is understood by many Muslims as doing so. He has noticed, after all, that this passage is not singular, that its injunction is a recurrent theme in the Koran, and that the sentiment is even more pronounced in the Hadith and other Islamic scriptures, which elevate jihad—in its original, accurate, military sense: waging war against unbelievers—to the highest form of worship. He has noticed, moreover, that Muslim militants seem to slay the idolaters and other unbelievers with some regularity.

So Wilders is not making this up. It is, in fact, a view of Muslim doctrine he shares with some of the world’s most renowned authorities on the subject. There is, for instance, Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the inspiration for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and also, according to Osama bin Laden, for the 9/11 attacks. Rahman’s leadership position in the global jihad stems solely from his scholarship—he is a doctor of Islamic jurisprudence and a graduate of Egypt’s al-Azhar University, the seat of Sunni learning. Or, to cite another example (and I could cite many others), there is Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, who fomented international rioting over cartoons of Mohammed and who urges jihadists to continue the fight “in Palestine, in Iraq, in Lebanon, and in every country that has been conquered by foreigners.” Our own State Department describes Qaradawi as an “intelligent and thoughtful voice” from the Middle East who “deserves our attention.”

For his trouble in pointing out the ability of doctrine to inspire action, Wilders has been indicted in Holland for “inciting hatred.” Prosecutors initially declined to pursue the case, but they have been overruled by Amsterdam’s craven court of appeals, which is paralyzed by dread of upsetting Dutch Muslims, who have been known to erupt in murderous riots over perceived slights.

Fitna runs about 15 minutes long. It depicts a phenomenon familiar to Britons who witnessed July 7 and Americans who lived through September 11: The faithful rendition of verses from the Koran, often recited by influential Islamic clerics, followed by acts of terrorism committed by Muslim militants who profess that they are simply putting those scriptures into action. To be sure, this is not the dominant interpretation among the world’s billion-plus Muslims, most of whom do not so much interpret their creed as ignore those parts that would otherwise trouble them. But to deny that Fitna reflects an intellectually consistent construction of Islam, adhered to by an energetic minority, is to deny reality.

Wilders, consequently, discerns parallels between the Koran and Adolph Hitler’s polemic, Mein Kampf. Let’s set aside the fact that the German kampf and the Arabic jihad convey the same meaning—struggle. The analogy pressed by Wilders is hardly foreign to British ears. As Middle East expert Daniel Pipes and researcher Andrew Bostom have noted, none less than Winston Churchill himself, in his history of the Second World War, described Mein Kampf as “the new Koran of faith and war: turgid, verbose, shapeless, but pregnant with its message.” One needn’t accept the analogy (Pipes, for example, does not) to concede it is not a frivolous one.

Today’s Britain, however, is not the Britain of Churchill and free expression, but of Jacqui Smith and multicultural hypersensitivity. Wilders intended to screen his film in the House of Lords in late January, but his trip was postponed due to the machinations of Nazir Ahmed, a Labour lord and grievance-industry agitator of the first order. As the Hudson Institute’s Thomas Landen reports, Lord Ahmed threatened to mobilize 10,000 rabble-rousers to prevent Wilders from entering Parliament. When the trip was rescheduled for this week, Smith’s office issued a curt letter apprising Wilders that he would not be admitted into the country. According to the letter, Wilders’s “statements about Muslims and their beliefs, as expressed in your film Fitna and elsewhere, would threaten community harmony and therefore public security in the U.K.” Later, the Home Office laughably maintained that by barring Wilders it was perforce barring “extremism, hatred, and violent messages.”

Of course, extremism, hatred, and violent messages have found a comfortable home in the birthplace of Western civil rights, where “community harmony” means that jihadists talk and you listen. In 2005, Lord Ahmed hosted a book launch for Joran Jermas, one of Sweden’s most rabid anti-Semites, who predictably ranted about the “Jewish supremacy drive,” the Jews as the “one reason for wars, terror and trouble” in the Middle East, and Zionist “control” of Western mass media. The following year, his guest at Westminster, a building that happens to be one of al-Qaeda’s most coveted targets, was Mahmoud Suliman Ahmed Abu Rideh, who attended a session of the House of Commons. Before his release in 2005, Abu Rideh, a Palestinian, had been detained under Britain’s Terrorism Act of 2001 (an enactment later voided by the law lords as a violation of human rights) due to al-Qaeda connections and threats to carry out a bombing plot. Not to worry: Abu Rideh explained that he didn’t leave his family to go to Afghanistan for jihad, but to set up a charitable school for children. Next case.

Suspected al-Qaeda members are welcome in Parliament, but not a member of the Dutch parliament. Britain has a revolving door for Islamic radicals but a closed door for their democratic critics. In 2004, British authorities insisted that the Bush administration return to the U.K. all Britons who, having been captured fighting with the enemy in Afghanistan and elsewhere, were held at Guantanamo Bay. After President Bush acceded, the former detainees were promptly released.

Not content with that, the Brits proceeded to demand that non-British detainees be shipped to England from Gitmo if they had any basis to claim legal U.K. residence. Despite the Pentagon’s protestations that these detainees were extremely dangerous, the Bush administration again relented. As night follows day, in late 2007, British authorities set the suspected terrorists free. And when this move aroused grave public concern, Lord Peter Henry Goldsmith, a former attorney general, gave voice to the Labour government’s dismissive party line: It did not matter whether the men were dangerous, because at stake was a “principle . . . which is more important.” “The principle,” Lord Goldsmith piously proclaimed, “is fundamental civil liberties.”

Indeed. Fundamental civil liberties for those committed to destroying the ever-diminishing British way of life. Cassandra has been shown the door.

Editor’s Note: This article has been corrected since it was first posted; the Hudson Institute report from Thomas Landen was misattributed.

— National Review’s Andrew C. McCarthy is the author of Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad (Encounter Books, 2008).

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries | 2 Comments »

How many senators and congresspersons should be investigated

Posted by thebosun on February 11, 2009

How many senators and congresspersons should be investigated


In the Hannity forum this morning, Red Wing Lion started an interesting post about the FBI probing 530 corporate fraud cases–Fox News

I watched banking reps getting grilled about their alleged mismanagement of TARP funds, and it got me to thinking how many US legislators in the Senate and House should get investigated too and who should do the grilling.

Watching Barney Frank at this morning Bank TARP Money hearing with his pompous attitude made my chuckle and also made me angry at the same time.

I figure that in the House, we have about 251 representatives of a variety of flavors. In the Senate we have about 100 representatives of a variety of flavors.

Just how many legislators are ethically challenged and have misguided agendas? Be specific on whom you believe should be under investigation and be specific on to whom and why they should be named in federal indictments.

What say you America?

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries | 2 Comments »

As heard on Rush, " Rank and file republicans "cooperate with Obama"

Posted by thebosun on January 23, 2009

Anyone part of the rank and file survey? 



Jan. 23 (Bloomberg) — Republican leaders’ efforts to select a new national party chairman are stirring concerns among a vital constituency: Republican voters.

Rank-and-file Republicans are telling their leaders they want more ethnic, gender and age diversity in a party that is dominated by white males. They also want party leaders to cooperate with President Barack Obama, according to surveys.

After losing the White House and 28 seats in Congress last year, some party leaders still aren’t hearing the message from voters who are urging them to claw their way back to power by promoting minorities and striking a less partisan tone, said Rich Bond, a former Republican National Committee chairman.

“We need a great deal more tolerance for the other guy’s point of view,” Bond said. “Not everybody comes from the same constituency as a majority-white homogenous district in the South where all people care about is keeping their guns and taxes.”

No wonder they lost. Bond is a ___________!

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries, Political Pundit, Politics, Politics/Debate | Leave a Comment »

Hamas in their own words

Posted by thebosun on January 16, 2009

VIEWED OVER 100,000 TIMES ON THE INTERNET [ http://www.memritv.org/video.html ]

Within the first week of its release, the MEMRI viral video “Hamas: In Their Own Voices,” has been viewed over 100,000 times on the Internet. It is still available for download, for a limited time only.

The video, a compilation of MEMRI TV clips that aired prior to the current Gaza crisis, includes statements by Hamas leaders calling for the annihilation of Israel and of all Jews, for death to America, and for the Islamic conquest of the world.

Featured are Hamas leader Khaled Mash’al, Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniya, Hamas MPs Mushir Al-Masri and Fathi Hamad, Hamas MP and cleric Yunis Al-Astal, Palestinian Legislative Council acting speaker Sheikh Ahmad Bahr, and Hamas clerics Wael Al-Zarad and Muhsen Abu ‘Ita.

Viewers will also see Hamas military training for adults and children, anti-American speeches at rallies including burning of the American flag and calls of support for “The Afghan Mujahideen,” Hamas Al-Aqsa TV children’s shows, and more.

Add the Video to Your Social Networking Pages [ http://www.memritv.org/video.html ]
You can view and download the video here . Email it, put it on your social networking pages, and share it with others.

Instructions on How to Download and Share the Video [ http://www.memritv.org/video.html ]
Share this video by uploading this clip to your YouTube, Facebook, and social network platforms.
Click here to get the link to embed the video on your blog and website

Visit http://www.MEMRITV.ORG for Other Clips from Hamas and Al-Aqsa TV

To see other clips on Hamas, visit the MEMRI TV pages for Al-Aqsa TV

( http://www.memritv.org/content/en/tv_chann…ndiv.htm?id=175 ) and for Hamas ( http://www.memritv.org/subject/en/95.htm ) – as well as the new MEMRI Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM) website ( http://www.memrijttm.org/ ).

Visit THEMEMRIBLOG.ORG for the Most Up-To-Date Middle East News

For the most up-to-date information on the Middle East, visit http://www.MEMRI.org/ .
For the latest MEMRI TV clips, visit http://www.memritv.org/ .
For breaking news you will get nowhere else, visit http://www.thememriblog.org/ .

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries | 1 Comment »

Protect and Preserve Your Free Speech Rights

Posted by thebosun on January 7, 2009

The “Fairness Doctrine” is The Censorship Doctrine

Media Research Center’s Free Speech Alliance is a fast-growing coalition of organizations and individuals, who, like you, cherish free speech and who have proactively joined to ensure the misnamed “Fairness Doctrine” never returns to silence the conservative voice in America.
First enacted by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) in 1949, the Fairness Doctrine required radio stations give equal time to all sides on political issues. However, the result wasn’t equal time, it was zero time – as stations simply avoided topics that would fall under FCC equal time rules.

In 1987, President Ronald Reagan rescinded the Fairness Doctrine and since then, talk radio has flourished. Conservatives dominate it, and liberals can’t stand it. By re-instating the Fairness Doctrine, liberals would effectively silence the conservative leaders of the day including Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham and others, and would essentially take control of all forms of media.

In recent months, the groundswell for reinstatement is intensifying. In fact, a growing number of liberal leaders in Washington, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, have openly stated their intent to do so.

As Americans, we cannot sit idly by while this gag order on conservative speech is resuscitated. The time to act is now—so when the time comes, we are mobilized and prepared to defend our Free Speech Rights.

Go to the link at Media Research Center and join the Free Speech Alliance: http://www.mrcaction.org/517/petition.asp?Ref_ID=2060&RID=17771283

Related Articles
Cafferty Slams ‘Gasbag’ Limbaugh, Reads E-mail Comparing Rush & Hannity to KKK

Blackout of Left’s “Fairness” Doctrine Push

Unmasking the Fairness Doctrine Message Muddle
What’s Fair Is Fair
Here They Come

Senator Tells Conservative Radio Station He’d Re-impose the Fairness Doctrine–on Them

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries | 3 Comments »

Protect and Preserve Your Free Speech Rights

Posted by thebosun on January 7, 2009

The “Fairness Doctrine” is The Censorship Doctrine

Media Research Center’s Free Speech Alliance is a fast-growing coalition of organizations and individuals, who, like you, cherish free speech and who have proactively joined to ensure the misnamed “Fairness Doctrine” never returns to silence the conservative voice in America.
First enacted by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) in 1949, the Fairness Doctrine required radio stations give equal time to all sides on political issues. However, the result wasn’t equal time, it was zero time – as stations simply avoided topics that would fall under FCC equal time rules.

In 1987, President Ronald Reagan rescinded the Fairness Doctrine and since then, talk radio has flourished. Conservatives dominate it, and liberals can’t stand it. By re-instating the Fairness Doctrine, liberals would effectively silence the conservative leaders of the day including Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham and others, and would essentially take control of all forms of media.

In recent months, the groundswell for reinstatement is intensifying. In fact, a growing number of liberal leaders in Washington, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, have openly stated their intent to do so.

As Americans, we cannot sit idly by while this gag order on conservative speech is resuscitated. The time to act is now—so when the time comes, we are mobilized and prepared to defend our Free Speech Rights.

Go to the link at Media Research Center and join the Free Speech Alliance: http://www.mrcaction.org/517/petition.asp?Ref_ID=2060&RID=17771283

Related Articles
Cafferty Slams ‘Gasbag’ Limbaugh, Reads E-mail Comparing Rush & Hannity to KKK

Blackout of Left’s “Fairness” Doctrine Push

Unmasking the Fairness Doctrine Message Muddle
What’s Fair Is Fair
Here They Come

Senator Tells Conservative Radio Station He’d Re-impose the Fairness Doctrine–on Them

Posted in Opinions and Commentaries | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.