The Bos\’un Locker

During times of war and during times of peace, we must prepare for tomorrow with the realities of today.

Archive for the ‘War’ Category

Report: Obama to Offer Israel ‘Nuclear Umbrella’ Against Iran

Posted by thebosun on December 11, 2008

Courtesy of Fox News , as reported from Haaetz:

U.S. president-elect will offer Israel a strategic pact designed to fend off any nuclear attack on the Jewish state by Iran, an Israeli newspaper reports.

President-elect Barack Obama will offer Israel a strategic pact designed to fend off any nuclear attack on the Jewish state by Iran, an Israeli newspaper reported on Thursday.

Haaretz, quoting an unnamed source, said the Obama administration would pledge under the proposed “nuclear umbrella” to respond to any Iranian strike on Israel with a “devastating U.S. nuclear response.”

Granting Israel a nuclear guarantee would essentially suggest the U.S. is willing to come to terms with a nuclear Iran, the paper reported.

According to the paper’s source, Obama’s nuclear guarantee would be backed by a new and improved Israeli anti-ballistic missile system. The Bush administration took the first step by deploying an early-warning radar system, which enhances the ability to detect Iranian ballistic missiles.

Secretary of state-designate Hillary Clinton had raised the idea of a nuclear guarantee to Israel during her campaign for the Democratic Party’s nomination for the presidency. During a debate with Obama in April, Clinton said that Israel and Arab countries must be given “deterrent backing.” She added, “Iran must know that an attack on Israel will draw a massive response.”

Clinton also proposed that the American nuclear umbrella be extended to other countries in the region, like Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, if they agree to relinquish their own nuclear ambitions.

Obama said this week that he would negotiate with Iran and would offer economic incentives for Tehran to relinquish its nuclear program. He warned that if Iran refused the deal, he would act to intensify sanctions against the Islamic Republic.
Granting Israel a nuclear guarantee essentially suggests the U.S. is willing to come to terms with a nuclear Iran. For its part, Israel opposes any such development and similar opposition was voiced by officials in the outgoing Bush administration.

“What is the significance of such guarantee when it comes from those who hesitated to deal with a non-nuclear Iran?” asked a senior Israeli security source.

“What kind of credibility would this [guarantee have] when Iran is nuclear-capable?”
The same source noted that the fact that there is talk about the possibility of a nuclear Iran undermines efforts to prevent Tehran from acquiring such arms.

A senior Bush administration source said that the proposal for an American nuclear umbrella for Israel was ridiculous and lacked credibility. “Who will convince the citizen in Kansas that the U.S. needs to get mixed up in a nuclear war because Haifa was bombed? And what is the point of an American response, after Israel’s cities are destroyed in an Iranian nuclear strike?”

The current debate is taking place in light of the Military Intelligence assessment that Iran has passed beyond the point of no return, and has mastered the technology of uranium enrichment. The decision to proceed toward the development of nuclear arms is now purely a matter for Iran’s leaders to decide. Intelligence assessments, however, suggest that the Iranians are trying to first accumulate larger quantities of fissile material, and this offers a window of opportunity for a last-ditch diplomatic effort to prevent an Iranian bomb.

Source: Obama’s atomic umbrella: U.S. nuclear strike if Iran nukes Israel

By Aluf Benn, Haaretz Correspondent

Related articles:

  • Israel worried by report Iran has tripled its missile arsenal
  • Zbigniew Brzezinski: Israel’s push for Iran strike may hurt U.S. ties
  • Iran rejects Barack Obama’s ‘failed’ carrot and stick policy
  •  

    Posted in 'War on Terror', Anti Semitic, Anti-Semitism, Arabian Gulf Region, Arabs, Holocaust, Iran, Islamic revolution, Islamic Theologian, Islamofascism, Israel, Jerusalem, Jew hater, Judism, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Middle East, Middle East Politics, Muslim, Muslim Brotherhood, Persia, Persian gulf, Persians, Religion, religious war, South Asia, South Asia - Middle East, Terrorism, War, War and Peace, War BLOGGING, World at War, Zionist Empire | Leave a Comment »

    Osprey V-22: No mishaps yet, in Iraq

    Posted by thebosun on February 14, 2008

    Courtesy of Multi-National Force Iraq 

     The Pentagon hasn’t been saying much about what’s up with the Osprey in Iraq. That could be because it doesn’t want to jinx what seems to be, after the first three months of deployment, a success story for the long-controversial tilt-rotor aircraft. (By contrast, try getting it to stop crowing about the performance of a different breed of new aerial technology, unmanned aerial vehicles such as the Reaper.) Since arriving at Al Asad Airbase last fall, the 10 MV-22 Ospreys of Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 263 have accumulated more than 1,600 hours of flight time, carrying hundreds of passengers–from ground troops to VIPs–and thousands of pounds of cargo “without a mishap or even a close call,” according to a story last week in The Dallas Morning News.

    That’s no small feat for an aircraft that critics cited time and time again for its checkered history of fatal crashes; among other things, they said, the aircraft could well fall prey to the dust it would stir up in the desert environment. Time magazine in October tarred the Osprey–which flies like both a helicopter and a fixed-wing airplane–in a cover story titled “A Flying Shame.” The Marines Corps did seem to be handling the 16-ton Osprey gingerly at first in Iraq, using it in less risky support missions, according to the Morning News story. (For the Dallas paper, this is something of a local story: Bell Helicopter Textron assembles the aircraft in Forth Worth and Amarillo.) But in December, the aircraft began to take part in combat missions. From day to day, anywhere from 50 percent to 100 percent of the Ospreys are ready to fly, the paper reported.

    That could be a sign of genuine and worrisome mechanical problems, or maybe just overly protective policies that keep airworthy Ospreys grounded. If all continues to go well, scores more Ospreys will be hitting the production line for eventual use by the Marines, the Navy, and the Air Force.

    Posted in 'War on Terror', CENTCOM, DoD, Marines, Military, U.S. Military, US Armed Forces, USMC, War, War and Peace, War BLOGGING | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

    Portents of A Nuclear Al-Qaeda

    Posted by thebosun on October 21, 2007

    Courtesy of Washington Post and by permission from the author, David Ignatius, Link to the article: Here

    Rolf Mowatt-Larssen is paid to think about the unthinkable. As the Energy Department‘s director of intelligence, he’s responsible for gathering information about the threat that a terrorist group will attack America with a nuclear weapon.

    With his shock of white hair and piercing eyes, Mowatt-Larssen looks like a man who has seen a ghost. And when you listen to a version of the briefing he has been giving recently to President Bush and other top officials, you begin to understand why. He is convinced that al-Qaeda is trying to acquire a nuclear bomb that will leave the ultimate terrorist signature — a mushroom cloud.

    We’ve all had enough fear-mongering to last a lifetime. Indeed, we have become so frightened of terrorism since Sept. 11, 2001, that we have begun doing the terrorists’ job for them by undermining the legal framework of our democracy. And truly, I wish I could dismiss Mowatt-Larssen’s analysis as the work of an overwrought former CIA officer with too many years in the trenches.

    But it’s worth listening to his warnings — not because they induce more numbing paralysis but because they might stir sensible people to take actions that could detect and stop an attack. That’s why his boss, Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman, is encouraging him to speak out. Mowatt-Larssen doesn’t want to anguish later that he didn’t sound the alarm in time.

    Mowatt-Larssen has been gathering this evidence since a few weeks after Sept. 11, when then-CIA Director George Tenet asked him to create a new branch on weapons of mass destruction in the agency’s counterterrorism center. He helped Tenet prepare the chapter on al-Qaeda’s nuclear efforts that appears in Tenet’s memoir, ” At the Center of the Storm.” Now that the uproar over Tenet’s mistaken “slam dunk” assessment of the Iraqi threat has died down, it’s worth rereading this account. It provides a chilling, public record of al-Qaeda’s nuclear ambitions.

    Mowatt-Larssen argues that for nearly a decade before Sept. 11, al-Qaeda was seeking to acquire weapons of mass destruction. As early as 1993, Osama bin Laden offered $1.5 million to buy uranium for a nuclear device, according to testimony presented in federal court in February 2001. When the al-Qaeda leader was asked in 1998 if he had nuclear or chemical weapons, he responded: “Acquiring weapons for the defense of Muslims is a religious duty. If I have indeed acquired these weapons, then I thank God for enabling me to do so.”

    Even as al-Qaeda was preparing to fly its airplane bombs into buildings, the group was also trying to acquire nuclear and biological capabilities. In August 2001, bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, met around a campfire with Pakistani scientists from a group called Umma Tameer-E-Nau to discuss how al-Qaeda could build a nuclear device. Al-Qaeda also had an aggressive anthrax program that was discovered in December 2001 after bin Laden was driven from his haven in Afghanistan.

    Al-Qaeda proclaimed a religious rationale to justify the WMD attacks it was planning. In June 2002, a Kuwaiti-born cleric named Suleiman Abu Ghaith posted a statement on the Internet saying that “al-Qaeda has the right to kill 4 million Americans” in retaliation for U.S. attacks against Muslims. And in May 2003, at the same time Saudi operatives of al-Qaeda were trying to buy three Russian nuclear bombs, a cleric named Nasir al-Fahd issued a fatwa titled “A Treatise on the Legal Status of Using Weapons of Mass Destruction Against Infidels.” Interrogations of al-Qaeda operatives confirmed that the planning was serious. Al-Qaeda didn’t yet have the materials for a WMD attack, but it wanted them.

    Most chilling of all was Zawahiri’s decision in March 2003 to cancel a cyanide attack in the New York subway system. He told the plotters to stand down because “we have something better in mind.” What did that mean? More than four years later, we still don’t know.

    After 2004, the WMD trail went cold, according to Mowatt-Larssen. Many intelligence analysts have concluded that al-Qaeda doesn’t have nuclear capability today. Mowatt-Larssen argues that a more honest answer is: We don’t know.

    So what to do about this spectral danger? The first requirement, says Mowatt-Larssen, is to try to visualize it. What would it take for al-Qaeda to build a bomb? How would it assemble the pieces? How would the United States and its allies deploy their intelligence assets so that they could detect a plot before it was carried out? How would we reinvent intelligence itself to avert this ultimate catastrophe?

    A terrorist nuclear attack, as Tenet wrote in his book, would change history. If we can see how this story might end, perhaps we can deflect the arrow before it hits its target.

    The writer is co-host of PostGlobal, an online discussion of international issues. His e-mail address is davidignatius@washpost.com.

    washingtonpost.com readers have posted over 187 comments about this item. View All Comments »

    .

    Posted in 'War on Terror', 9/11, Afghanistan, anti-US, Arabs, Asia, CIA, counter terrorism, counterterrorism, Department of Defense, Domestic Terrorism, Egypt, government agencies, Iran, Iraq War, Iraqi, Israel/Hizbollah, Middle East, Middle East & Muslim World, Middle East Politics, Military, National Counterterrorism Center, National Security, NCTC, NSA, real war, Security matters, South Asia, Terror Surveillance Program, Terrorism, War, War and Peace, World at War, World War III | 1 Comment »

    More on Pelosi’s rebuke of Pete Stark at Stop the ACLU

    Posted by thebosun on October 21, 2007

    Courtesy of Spree at Stop the ACLU

    Pelosi, the latest politician to rebuke Pete Stark.

    Of course being a Democratic politician, Nancy Pelosi’s rebuke was mild, but even she understood some sort of rebuke was necessary from her, as Speaker of the House, regarding Pete Stark’s remarks on the floor of the House. (Hat Tip to Lew for the email)

    One of Pete Stark’s remarks:

    “You don’t have money to fund the war or children,” Stark accused Republicans. “But you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement.”

    Nancy Pelosi’s mild rebuke: (From the San Francisco Chronicle)

    “While members of Congress are passionate about their views, what Congressman Stark said during the debate was inappropriate and distracted from the seriousness of the subject at hand – providing health care for America’s children,” Pelosi, D-San Francisco, said.

    This is not the first time Nancy Pelosi has had her own underlings in the Democratic party undermine her as she was trying to focus everyones attention on SCHIP.

    Right before the SCHIP veto by the president, you might remember that Nancy was upset that House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) decided to unveil his Iraq “war tax” idea, which raged through the blogosphere for about 4 hours before Nancy nixed it publicly, upset that Obey had shifted focus from SCHIP to the war tax, at a critical time.

    The Democratic party cannot seem to stay on the same page. Almost like the left hand having no clue what the right hand is doing.

    This type of rhetoric from Stark is not new though, his past is strife with him making inappropriate comments, one time, in 2003, the police even had to be called to the hearing.

    In 1990, Stark told Health and Human Services Director Louis Sullivan, an African American, that he was a disgrace to his race.

    In 2001, Stark made a reference to the children of Rep. J.C. Watts, R-Okla., all being “born out of wedlock. Patently untrue, but that rarely matters to Stark who is known as a back bencher that cannot control his tongue.

    He also accused Rep. Nancy Johnson, R-Conn., of being a “whore for the insurance industry.

    In 2003, Stark, called Rep. Scott McInnis, R-Colo., “a little wimp” and a “little fruitcake” — and suggested the two should step outside. Capitol police were called to the hearing. (Source)

    It is pretty bad when the San Francisco Chronicle says:

    Surely there must be someone along the shoreline between Alameda and Fremont who could represent the good citizens of the district with class and dignity. It’s not the case now.

    Republican politicians had some critical words for Pete Stark following his latest outburst.

    John Boehner issued a press release:

    “Our troops in Iraq are fighting against al-Qaeda and other radical jihadists hellbent on killing the people we are sent here to represent. Congressman Stark’s statement dishonors not only the Commander-in-Chief, but the thousands of courageous men and women of America’s armed forces who believe in their mission and are putting their lives on the line for our freedom and security. Congressman Stark should retract his statement and apologize to the House, our Commander-in-Chief, and the families of our soldiers and commanders fighting terror overseas. ”

    Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas:

    “It is despicable to have a member of this Congress accuse this president, any president, of willfully blowing the heads, quote, blowing the heads off our young men and women over in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

    Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, said the remarks:

    “were hateful and wrong, and should be labeled as such by the House Democrat leadership.”

    Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri:

    Pete Stark’s statements on the House floor this afternoon crossed all lines of decency and decorum. As a member of Congress, he should be ashamed. But as a senior member of the Ways and Means Committee –- and the current chairman of its Health subcommittee –- the Democratic leadership ought to be ashamed as well.”

    Steny Hoyer (D) said Stark’s remarks were “unfortunate” and “totally inappropriate”, he then went on to say that he’s hopeful that Stark will express his regrets because he says that these comments have been a distraction and CNN is told that several Democratic lawmakers have called Stark today and made it clear that what Stark said on the House floor yesterday was hurting their cause.

    That comment from Hoyer is not going to make the lunatic fringe of their party very happy at all, because the far left, liberal, unhinged portion of the party do not want Stark to apologize and those are the people that lead Stark by the nose. Some even claim it is only the Republicans that are upset at Stark, completely ignoring Pelosi’s words, Hoyer’s words and the fact that other Democratic politicians are calling Stark to make him apologize.

    The National Republican Campaign Committee issued a press release:

    DEMOCRAT DISGRACE:
    Pete Stark Drags SCHIP Political Circus to All-Time Low

    Washington – Just moments ago, in an outrageous and delusional tantrum on the House floor, California Congressman Pete Stark trampled on the sacrifice of our troops fighting on the frontlines while simultaneously questioning the motivations of the Commander-in-Chief in wartime.

    Pete Stark and the Democrat leadership owe the American people an apology, the troops and their families an apology, and they should apologize to the millions of children being held political hostage by their party’s desperate attempt to score a political victory instead of providing healthcare for those who need it most.

    While Pelosi and Hoyer are upset about Stark “distracting” from the SCHIP issue, Stark’s insane cheer leading squad from the far left are encouraging him.

    More proof that they party is not only divided but the fringes have the uncanny ability to work against the leadership of their own party, which is one reason they cannot seem to get anything done and are running at a 11% approval rating.

    Can any one say…. self destruct mode?

    [Update] Gateway Pundit shows that when the nutroots cannot win an argument, they simply lie about it.

    Nutrooters Crooks and Liars discovers that if you can’t possibly win an argument over the latest disgusting anti-military, anti-Bush remarks by a Democratic politician…
    Then just lie about it.

    Cross posted @ Wake up America

    .

    Rhymes With Right linked with Pete Stark Is A Piece Of Excrement</< a>
    Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator linked with Democrat’s Iraq Outburst Draws GOP Ire</< a>

    Posted in Constitutional issues, Democrats and Republicans, Domestic Politics, Give war a chance, Iraq War, Political Pundit, Politics, President Bush, real war, War, War and Peace, War BLOGGING, World at War, World War III | Leave a Comment »

    Is Another Congressman Guilty of TREASON???

    Posted by thebosun on October 19, 2007

    DISCLAIMER: The different points of views on the Rick Roberts are not supported nor do they reflect the views and beliefs of The Bosun Locker or any entity affiliated with The Bosun.

    ANOTHER CONGRESSMAN GUILTY OF TREASON… 
    Courtesy of  Rick Roberts, KFMB San Diego
    October 19th, 2007

    Congressman Pete Stark is a liberal, democrat congressman from the Amsterdam of the United States: San Fran-sicko.

    HE NEEDS TO RESIGN. WHY? JUST READ SOME OF WHAT HE SAID IN CONGRESS YESTERDAY:

      “The Republicans are worried that we can’t pay for insuring an additional 10 million children. They sure don’t care about finding 200 billion dollars to fight the illegal war in Iraq. Where are you going to get that money? Are you going to tell us lies like you’re telling us today? Is that how you’re going to fund the war?

      You don’t have money to fund the war or children. But you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement.

      But the President Bush’s statements about children’s health shouldn’t be taken any more seriously than his lies about the war in Iraq. The truth is that Bush just likes to blow things up in Iraq, in the United States, and in Congress”.

    Disgusting, is it not?

    I am SICK AND TIRED of these corrupt politicians forgetting the vital, big-as-life fact that our brave military is an all-volunteer army.

    Our men in uniform are a throwback to the brave souls that fought for our freedoms during WWII; they are a intelligent, strong, courageous, and selfless force.

    A single soldier has more guts in their little finger than Stark, Durbin, Reid (and countless others) COMBINED.

    But the democrats don’t see it that way. They see our nation’s military as a bunch of children strong-armed by evil conservatives to fight a nonexistent enemy.

    I’M SICK OF IT!! Each and every one of these democrats- like Stark, like Reid, like Turban Durbin- need to STEP DOWN. They’re not worthy of leadership. We’re at war with a VERY REAL enemy. These officials need to be pulled away from their cushy executive chairs and thrown out in the middle of Fallujah without protection so that they can see what’s REALLY going on.

    So you don’t believe there’s an enemy, Rep. Stark? You believe that our brave servicemen are having their “heads blown off” by a herd of President Bush clones in bed sheets? Because looking at the context of what you’re currently saying and what you’ve said in the past- that seems to be what you think!

    But I digress…

    Do you want to vent? Call Rep. Stark’s office. Give them a piece of your mind:

    510-494-1388

    Or fax:

    510-494-5852

    Email via web form HERE.

    Or call his D.C. office at…

    202-225-5065

    You can also fax his D.C. office:

    202-226-3805

    Tell Stark that he does NOT represent the State of California. Tell Stark that he’s a DISGRACE to the United States of America and everything that it was founded on. Individuals like him do not deserve to be in the House. They deserve to be on a stake!!

    Comments at Rick Roberts site »

    .

    Posted in anti-US, CENTCOM, Conservative Talk, Democrats and Republicans, Department of Defense, DoD, Domestic Politics, Dublicitous Democrats, duplicitous democrats, Economics and Politics, Freedom, Freedom of Speech/Politics, Heroes, Iraq, Iraq War, Iraqi, Marines, Military, News, News and Information, Political Pundit, Politics, Politics/Debate, real war, Rick Roberts, KFMB San Diego, U.S. Military, US Armed Forces, US News, US of A, USMC, War, War BLOGGING, World at War, World War III | 7 Comments »

    Army leaders urge congressional support

    Posted by thebosun on October 3, 2007

    Courtesy of Multi-National Forces Iraq

    Army leaders urge congressional support to meet current, future demands 
     

    Lt. Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III (right), commander, XVIII Airborne Corps, Col. Jeffrey L. Bannister (center), commander, 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team and Iraqi Brig. Gen. Abdulah plan operations near Baghdad Sept. 11. The Army is strained by six years of war and needs support, Gen. George W. Casey Jr. told Congress Sept. 26. Photo by U.S. Army Spc. Nicholas A. Hernandez.

    Lt. Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III (right), commander, XVIII Airborne Corps, Col. Jeffrey L. Bannister (center), commander, 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team and Iraqi Brig. Gen. Abdulah plan operations near Baghdad Sept. 11. The Army is strained by six years of war and needs support, Gen. George W. Casey Jr. told Congress Sept. 26. Photo by U.S. Army Spc. Nicholas A. Hernandez.

    BAGHDAD

    — The Army, stressed and stretched by six years of conflict, needs continued and uninterrupted support and resourcing to maintain its current operational levels while preparing for the future, its top civilian and military leaders told Congress Sept. 26.

    Army Chief of Staff Gen. George W. Casey Jr. outlined four imperatives for the House Armed Services Committee that he called critical to the Army’s ability to restore balance and maintain the all-volunteer force:

    • Improving the way the Army sustains Soldiers, Families and Civilians;

    • Preparing troops for success in the current conflict;

    • Resetting troops and equipment for future deployments; and

    • Transforming the force for the 21st century.

    Gen. Casey urged committee members to support these efforts into the next fiscal year, and to ensure there’s no funding gap after Oct. 1 that could slow efforts under way.

    “The Army is the best in the world at what it does, because of our values, our ethos, our people and your support,” he said.

    Keeping that standard, he said, will require more hard sacrifices by Soldiers and their Families and clear recognition by national leaders of the threat the country faces and the need to maintain an Army able to face it.

    Calling Soldiers “our ultimate asymmetric advantage” in the war on terror, he said the Army needs to continue improving the way it recruits, trains and retains them.

    While increasing the readiness of the force, the Army also must increase the quality of life it provides its members as well as their Families, he said.

    Army Secretary Pete Geren noted that the Army’s focus has moved from pay issues that dominated the 1970s and housing issues that dominated the 1990s. Today, in an era of persistent conflict that’s expected to continue into the foreseeable future, the big emphasis must be on taking care of Families, he said.

    “Twelve months (deployed overseas) was asking a lot of those Families, and 15 months is asking more,” he said.

    Gen. Casey said the Army needs to ensure that the quality of life it provides Soldiers and their Families “is commensurate with the quality of service” they are providing.

    Meanwhile, the Army must continue preparing troops to succeed in the current conflict, he said. The Army has made “great strides,” continually adapting as the operational environment changes, he said.

    It’s also committed to providing the best equipment possible to give Soldiers the technological advantage on the battlefield, he said, as well as tough, demanding training at their home stations that ensures they have the skills and confidence to win.

    “Military success is tied to the capabilities of our leaders and Soldiers,” Gen. Casey said, promising that the Army won’t fail them.

    To keep that promise, the Army must focus on resetting the force, he said. Resetting means more than simply fixing or replacing equipment that’s being used at five times its programmed rate, he told the committee. It also means giving Soldiers and their Families time to regroup between deployments.

    Secretary Geren noted that the current Army force is carrying the lion’s share of the third-longest conflict in U.S. history. Not since the Revolutionary War has the country asked this much of an all-volunteer force for this long, he told the committee.

    And as the country faces what is expected to continue to be an era of persistent conflict, it must take care of its troops and their Families to ensure the all-volunteer force remains strong, he said.

    Today’s Army is the best-led, best-equipped and best-trained force that’s ever been to the field, Secretary Geren said. He expressed hope that with congressional support and funding, the Army will be able to continue making that claim five, 10, even 20 years into the future.

    So as the Army focuses on the current conflict, it must keep looking ahead as well to ensure it’s ready to face future threats, Gen. Casey said. This involves fielding the best new equipment to fighting forces, incorporating new techniques and fielding the Army’s future combat systems to brigade combat teams to ensure the Army has a decisive advantage on the battlefield.

    The Army’s transformation is “a holistic effort” that affects the way it fights, trains and modernizes, he said. “It’s a journey for us, not a destination,” Gen. Casey told the lawmakers.

    (Story by Donna Miles, special to American Forces Press Service)

    In other Developments around Iraq:

    BAGHDAD – Coalition forces killed two terrorists and detained 21 suspected terrorists Saturday and Sunday during operations to disrupt al-Qaeda in Iraq networks in the Tigris River Valley.

    BAGHDAD – Iraqi Special Operations Forces, with U.S. Special Operations Forces as advisers, detained 16 suspected terrorists during three separate intelligence-driven operations Sept. 29 throughout Iraq.

     

    Posted in 'War on Terror', Arabian Gulf Region, Arabs, Asia, counter terrorism, counterterrorism, Department of Defense, Give war a chance, Iraq, Iraq War, Iraqi, Middle East, Military, real war, South Asia, South Asia - Middle East, Terrorism, Uncategorized, US Armed Forces, War, War and Peace, War BLOGGING, World at War | Leave a Comment »

    SILENCE IN SYRIA, PANIC IN IRAN

    Posted by thebosun on September 30, 2007

    Posted by permission of the author, Dr. Jack Wheeler, To the Point News

    SILENCE IN SYRIA, PANIC IN IRAN

    One of India’s top ranking generals assigned to liaise with the Iranian military recently returned to New Delhi from several days in Tehran – in a state of complete amazement.

    “Everyone in the government and military can only talk of one thing,” he reports.  “No matter who I talked to, all they could do was ask me, over and over again, ‘Do you think the Americans will attack us?’ ‘When will the Americans attack us?’ ‘Will the Americans attack us in a joint operation with the Israelis?’ How massive will the attack be?’ on and on, endlessly.  The Iranians are in a state of total panic.”

    And that was before September 6.  Since then, it’s panic-squared in Tehran.  The mullahs are freaking out in fear.  Why?  Because of the silence in Syria.

    On September 6, Israeli Air Force F-15 and F-16s conducted a devastating attack on targets deep inside Syria near the city of Dayr az-Zawr.  Israel’s military censors have muzzled the Israeli media, enforcing an extraordinary silence about the identity of the targets.  Massive speculation in the world press has followed, such as Brett Stephens’ Osirak II? in yesterday’s (9/18) Wall St. Journal.

    Stephens and most everyone else have missed the real story.  It is not Israel’s silence that “speaks volumes” as he claims, but Syria’s.  Why would the Syrian government be so tight-lipped about an act of war perpetrated on their soil?
    The first half of the answer lies in this story that appeared in the Israeli media last month (8/13):  Syria’s Antiaircraft System Most Advanced In World.  Syria has gone on a profligate buying spree, spending vast sums on Russian systems, “considered the cutting edge in aircraft interception technology.”

    Syria now “possesses the most crowded antiaircraft system in the world,” with “more than 200 antiaircraft batteries of different types,”  some of which are so new that they have been installed in Syria “before being introduced into Russian operation service.”

    While you’re digesting that, take a look at the map of Syria:
     
    Notice how far away Dayr az-Zawr is from Israel.  An F15/16 attack there is not a tiptoe across the border, but a deep, deep penetration of Syrian airspace.  And guess what happened with the Russian super-hyper-sophisticated cutting edge antiaircraft missile batteries when that penetration took place on September 6th.
    Nothing.

    El blanko.  Silence.  The systems didn’t even light up, gave no indication whatever of any detection of enemy aircraft invading Syrian airspace, zip, zero, nada.  The Israelis (with a little techie assistance from us) blinded the Russkie antiaircraft systems so completely the Syrians didn’t even know they were blinded.

    Now you see why the Syrians have been scared speechless.  They thought they were protected – at enormous expense – only to discover they are defenseless.  As in naked.

    Thus the Great Iranian Freak-Out – for this means Iran is just as nakedly defenseless as Syria.   I can tell you that there are a lot of folks in the Kirya (IDF headquarters in Tel Aviv) and the Pentagon right now who are really enjoying the mullahs’ predicament.  Let’s face it:  scaring the terror masters in Tehran out of their wits is fun.

    It’s so much fun, in fact, that an attack destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities and the Revolutionary Guard command/control centers has been delayed, so that France (under new management) can get in on the fun too. 

    On Sunday (9/16), Sarkozy’s foreign minister Bernard Kouchner announced that “France should prepare for the possibility of war over Iran’s nuclear program.”
    All of this has caused Tehran to respond with maniacal threats.  On Monday (9/17), a government website proclaimed that “600 Shihab-3 missiles” will be fired at targets in Israel in response to an attack upon Iran by the US/Israel.  This was followed by Iranian deputy air force chief Gen. Mohammad Alavi announcing today (9/19) that “we will attack their (Israeli) territory with our fighter bombers as a response to any attack.”

    A sure sign of panic is to make a threat that everyone knows is a bluff.  So our and Tel Aviv’s response to Iranian bluster is a thank-you-for-sharing yawn and a laugh.  Few things rattle the mullahs’ cages more than a yawn and a laugh.

    Yet no matter how much fun this sport with the mullahs is, it is also deadly serious.  The pressure build-up on Iran is getting enormous.  Something is going to blow and soon.  The hope is that the blow-up will be internal, that the regime will implode from within.

    But make no mistake:  an all-out full regime take-out air assault upon Iran is coming if that hope doesn’t materialize within the next 60 to 90 days.  The Sept. 6 attack on Syria was the shot across Iran’s bow.

    So – what was attacked near Dayr az-Zawr?  It’s possible it was North Korean “nuclear material” recently shipped to Syria, i.e., stuff to make radioactively “dirty” warheads, but nothing to make a real nuke with as the Norks don’t have real nukes (see Why North Korea’s Nuke Test Is Such Good News, October 2006).

    Another possibility is it was to take out a stockpile of long-range Zilzal surface-to-surface missiles recently shipped from Iran for an attack on Israel.

    A third is it was a hit on the stockpile of Saddam’s chemical/bio weapons snuck out of Iraq and into Syria for safekeeping before the US invasion of April 2003.

    But the identity of the target is not the story – for the primary point of the attack was not to destroy that target.  It was to shut down Syria’s Russian air defense system during the attack.  Doing so made the attack an incredible success.

    Syria is shamed and silent.  Iran is freaking out in panic.  Defenseless enemies are fun.

    Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

    Posted in Arabian Gulf Region, Asia, Coffee and Conversation, Daily Briefing on Iran, Iran, Persians, real war, South Asia, Syria, War, War and Peace, War BLOGGING, World at War | 3 Comments »

    Al-Zawahiri to the U.S.: "Do Not Ask President Bush When The Soldiers Will Return– Ask Instead How Many Will Return"

    Posted by thebosun on September 21, 2007

    VIEW THE NEW MEMRI TV WEBSITE AT: www.memritv.org

    Special Dispatch-Jihad and Terrorism Studies Project  September 21, 2007

    No. 1721

    Al-Zawahiri to the U.S.: “Do Not Ask President Bush When The Soldiers Will Return– Ask Instead How Many Will Return”

    To view this Special Dispatch in HTML, visit:
    Al-Zawahiri to the U.S.: “Do Not Ask President Bush When The Soldiers Will Return– Ask Instead How Many Will Return”.

    The Islamist website www.ekhlaas.org/forum/, which is hosted by Layered Technologies, Inc. in Texas, USA, posted, on September 20, 2007, an 80-minute video of Al-Qaeda second-in-command Ayman Al-Zawahiri speaking on the occasion of the sixth anniversary of 9/11.

    The video was produced by the Al-Sahab media company in the month of Sha’ban, 1428 (August-September 2007), apparently prior to September 11, 2007, and is subtitled in English.

    In the video, statements by Al-Zawahiri are interspersed with footage of jihad fighters in various places around the world, audio clips from Osama bin Laden’s speeches, statements by Western commentators and U.S. officials, and more.

    Following are the main points of Al-Zawahiri’s statements in the video:

    First, Al-Zawahiri expresses his condolences for the death of the martyr cleric Maulana Abd Al-Rashid Ghazi in Afghanistan, promises to avenge his death, and calls on Muslims to follow in his path and in the path of other jihad-fighting clerics.

    Al-Zawahiri then accuses Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf of selling Pakistan’s honor and religion, and says that Musharraf’s forces are serving “the hunting dogs of the Crusaders-Zionists.”

    He then spoke of the Americans’ defeat in Iraq by the jihad fighters; an announcer then attributes this to the “sacrifice of the jihad fighters, first among them Abu Mus’ab Al-Zarqawi.”

    Al-Zawahiri then advised the Americans, “Do not ask President Bush when the soldiers will return; ask instead how many of them will return.”

    Al-Zawahiri called on the Muslims in the Maghreb to bring Andalusia back into the fold of Islam, and stated that this could only be done by “purging the Islamic Maghreb of the French and the Spanish who have returned there.”

    He calls on the Sudanese to wage jihad against the Crusader invasion of Darfur, as their brothers did in Iraq and in Afghanistan.

    Further on in the video, Al-Zawahiri addresses the issue of jihad in Somalia, Chechnya, and Palestine, and calls on the Islamic nation to support the jihad fighters “under the victorious banner of the Prophet.”

    *********************

    The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.
    MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.

    The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)
    P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
    Phone: (202) 955-9070
    Fax: (202) 955-9077
    E-Mail: memri@memri.org
    Search previous MEMRI publications at www.memri.org

    Posted in al-Qaeda, Anti Semitic, Anti-Semitism, anti-US, apostasy, Asia, Bin Laden, Caliphate, Egypt, Global Jihad, hamas, Hizbollah, Hizbollah Vs Israel?, International News, Iran, Iraq, Iraq War, Iraqi, Islamic revolution, Islamic Theologian, Islamisation, Islamist, Islamofascism, Israel, Israel/Hizbollah, Middle East, Muslim, Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim Religion, National Security, News, News and Information, Osama Bin Laden, Pakistan, Persia, real war, Religion, religious war, Security matters, South Asia, South Asia - Middle East, Syria, US News, War, War BLOGGING, World at War, World News and Politics | Leave a Comment »

    Bin Laden Urges Pakistani Jihad

    Posted by thebosun on September 20, 2007

    Courtesy of AP News, MyWay

      CAIRO, Egypt (AP) – Al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden called on Pakistanis to rebel against President Pervez Musharraf in a new recording released on Thursday, saying his military’s siege of a militant mosque stronghold makes him an infidel.

    The storming of the Red Mosque in Islamabad in July “demonstrated Musharraf’s insistence on continuing his loyalty, submissiveness and aid to America against the Muslims … and makes armed rebellion against him and removing him obligatory,” bin Laden said in the message.

    “So when the capability is there, it is obligatory to rebel against the apostate ruler, as is the case now,” he said, according to a transcript released by Laura Mansfield, a U.S. terrorism expert who monitors militant message traffic.

    Bin Laden’s voice was heard over a video showing previously released footage of the terror leader. It was posted Thursday on Islamic militant Web sites.

    For the rest of the story: Bin Laden calls for Jihad in Pakistan

    Posted in 'War on Terror', 9/11, al-Qaeda, anti-US, Arabian Gulf Region, Arabs, Asia, Bin Laden, Caliphate, counter terrorism, counterterrorism, Global Jihad, International News, Islamic revolution, Islamic Theologian, Islamisation, Islamist, Islamofascism, Middle East, Middle East & Muslim World, Middle East Politics, Moderate Arabs, Muslim, Muslim Religion, News and Information, Osama Bin Laden, Pakistan, Religion, South Asia, South Asia - Middle East, Terrorism, US News, War, World at War, World News and Politics, World War III | Leave a Comment »

    Ayman al-Zawahri releases new video tape days after Osama

    Posted by thebosun on September 20, 2007

    Zawahiri

    CAIRO, Egypt (AP) – Al-Qaeda’s deputy leader Ayman al-Zawahri said the United States was being defeated in Afghanistan, Iraq and other fronts in a new video released Thursday, the latest in a series put out by the terror network.

    The video came days after Osama bin Laden released two messages to mark the Sept. 11 anniversary—including his first new appearance in a video in nearly three years.

    The 80-minute video posted on Islamic militant Web sites Thursday was in a documentary style, touting al-Qaeda’s activities in various areas, including Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia and North Africa.   For the rest of the article: New al-Qaeda Video Released

    Posted in 'War on Terror', 9/11, al-Qaeda, anti-US, apostasy, Arabian Gulf Region, Arabs, Asia, Bin Laden, Caliphate, counter terrorism, counterterrorism, Egypt, Global Jihad, International News, Islamic revolution, Islamic Theologian, Islamisation, Islamist, Islamofascism, Middle East, Middle East & Muslim World, Middle East Politics, Muslim, Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim Religion, News, News and Information, Osama Bin Laden, Religion, South Asia, South Asia - Middle East, Terrorism, Uncategorized, US News, War, War and Peace, World at War, World News and Politics, World War III | Leave a Comment »